The
book Tom Brown's School Days was more or less mandatory reading for school-boys a couple of
generations ago. I still remember one sentence: There is an end to everything
in life and that is the important point. It referred to Tom Brown's first day
at school when, as the newest boy, he was the last one in the list.
As the
names of the boys were called, Tom Brown was getting more and more anxious
whether his turn would ever come and, when it did, if he would be able to
respond. The important point is, it did happen, his turn did come and he was
able to respond. But that is another story.
Our
Constitution-makers introduced reservation only for the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes in jobs and in admissions to colleges, and that too for ten
years, though with possible extensions if need be.
They
rejected Dr Ambedkar's suggestion that it should be for a fixed period of 30 or
40 years, with no provision for extension. Thus, the system has been extended
every ten years, for nearly 70 years.
The
scheme has also been extended to backward castes, Other Backward Castes and Most
Backward Castes as well. It has created such a vested interest that there
appears to be no way that it will ever end. Unlike Tom Brown's attendance, the
important point does not seem to happen; there appears to be no end to the
process of reservation.
I am
reminded of this factor because of the banning of the film Aarakshan by UP,
Punjab etc. The opposition to screening the movie comes from the view that no
one, not even a film producer, can discuss the issue. I must confess I have not
seen the film and, as I am out of the town due to some reason, I don’t know
what will be the outcome of all these issues?
However,
my concern is not about what the film depicts but the issue of freedom of
speech. Does our legal system prohibit even the discussion of this or any other
controversial issue?
ESCHEWING THE SYSTEM
I think
the reservation system is being perpetuated, not out of hatred for the upper
castes, but because it has become an enormous source of wealth for the
beneficiaries. It will probably come to an end not because of opposition or
even criticism from the affected communities but because the beneficiaries get
tired of it and give it up on their own.
For
instance, Dr Arokiaswamy joined IIT Delhi after getting a Ph.D. from the
Imperial College, London. Two years later, a note from the IIT administration to the
effect was received that, as per government instructions, there must be a
Scheduled Caste member on the selection committee for appointment to reserved
posts and would Dr Arokiaswamy be released, the only such member in the
Institute.
Dr Arokiaswamy was asked why he never said he
belonged to the Scheduled Caste. He just laughed. He was an outstanding
engineer who demonstrated how linear motors — the basis of modern high-speed
railways — could be built. Unfortunately, our railways are very conservative;
they would not listen to him. Otherwise, we would have been ahead of the
Chinese in developing such systems.
I have
heard of another social scientist who — along with all others — was removed from
a prestigious think-tank when a new director took over. After hearing that one
of the persons he had removed was from the Scheduled Caste, the Director called
him to assure that his job was safe. The social scientist cut him short by
saying ‘I know why you have called me and I do not want to work in an
organisation that makes such a distinction'.
There
must be thousands of such people who do not want to make use of the reservation
system. The persons we hear of and see on the TV are the different kind; they
insist all the time how badly they have been treated. For instance, IIT Delhi
introduced recently a special course for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribe
candidates. It was a tactless move but not really a bad one because, even after
forty years, many of those students were at the bottom of the class. What a
furore there was on the discrimination they received! But nobody realised or
thought it fit to point out they were in the IIT only because they were
discriminated against in the first place.
DIFFERENT PARAMETERS
Caste
is a permanent attribute that cannot be removed or lost. Thus, reservation
based on caste has identified certain communities as deserving and some others
as undeserving of government patronage for all time.
If
reservation had been based not on caste but on income — for instance, for all
BPL families — practically no Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe would have
been excluded, but the beneficiaries would have changed every generation.
Further, it should not have been at the tertiary level; but at the primary and
secondary level in the best schools in the country. Then, the bitterness of
caste divisions would not have been politically perpetuated as they are now. As
matters stand, I am not sure when the important tipping point — that there is an
end to everything in life — will ever occur in this case.
No comments:
Post a Comment